Chatboards
Mailrings
Classifieds
Lessons
Jobs
Harry Wong
Projects
Live!
Gazette
Advertise
SUBSCRIBE | SUBMIT
Dec 2017
Vol 14 No 4
BACK ISSUES


Purposefully Disruptive Students in the Classroom

By Stewart Brekke
 

on the teacher to create a poor learning situation through no fault of the teacher. It is well known that the non-renewal of  beginning teacher contracts is due often to the lack of disciplinary skills of the new teacher. If a beginning teacher is lucky enough to get a well behaved class at first, the odds are that the new teacher will have a contract renewal.

I have seen a number of teachers having disruptive students penalized by the school administration by dismissal or lowered teacher ratings.
Primarily, there has to be good support by the administration for teachers in disciplinary situations. I have been in schools where formal
discipline referrals were discouraged. The teachers were supposed to handle the discipline problems themselves. This often resulted in poor
learning environments and in those schools I would often walk by classrooms in which little learning took place because the students did not have to face the consequences of their bad behavior.

I was in one school as a math teacher and the students tried to run the classroom. I would not let them run the class since I was the teacher. I filed a number of discipline referrals repeatedly and was sent to the principal where the discipline assistant principal told the principal that I was a “bad teacher” because I was filing “too many discipline referrals.” Once I filed a union grievance about this, the principal had to back down and I was then told by the union I could file as many discipline referrals as necessary. Also, in another school I was in I taught chemistry.

In the class there was an LD student who every day purposefully disrupted the class so that I could not teach. Because I called the office to get security to remove the student  almost every day, the principal tuned off my intercom to the office at that time instead of properly dealing with this disruptive student. I solved the problem by calling the school office on my cellphone. In each school “good teaching” not only depends upon the teacher, but also on the support of the administration and the mix of students in the room.

In the book Escalante: The Best Teacher in America by Jay Mathews, Mr Escalante, the famous math teacher who did wonders in an inner city school, he states he also had purposefully disruptive students. His prescription in dealing with these disruptors was to exclude them from the classroom as soon as possible. There was chemistry teacher in our school and one of her students told me that they were purposefully disruptive in order to get the principal to fire her. Why the present Secretary of Education and the Attorney General of the United States are trying to reduce strong disiplinary measures towards classroom disruptors is because they have never taught a class in a school in  which there are these purposeful disruptors interfering with their  teaching.

In the inner city, where I did most of my teaching for 26 years, mostly in Black populated schools, the decent majority of students are
constantly subjected to the disruptions of a few so that learning cannot always take place. In one high school I was at we took a survey of our
500 students about disruptions in their classes and 40% of the students indicated that their classes were routinely purposefully disrupted. While in recent days the Secretary of Education stated that minority students are more often suspended for school disruptions, he does not address the real problem that there are more problem minority students in minority populated schools. Often, from my experience it is the Black principals that are toughest on the minority students because they know that the purposeful disruptive behavior is often purposeful
and the Black principals want the well behaved Black students to get a good education.

Moreover, problem children continually and purposefully  disrupt the learning environment all through the good students’ elementary and secondary school experience. As a result a number of Black children get to high school unable to read at grade level and are very weak in basic mathematics skills. Subjects such as English, writing and reading, and algebra and chemistry and physics, build on these reading and mathematics skills and are thereforemuch more difficult for these decent Black children since their education in high school and elementary classrooms are repeatedly interfered with. The hope that schooling offers to these children in poverty in the inner cities is slowly dashed because of these problem children in their classes. Because of this disruptive learning environment, these children, when they get to college, are behind the other students when it comes to university physics, chemistry and advanced mathematics. As a result of this deficit they are locked into jobs that pay far less than jobs in engineering and science requiring a college degree.

It takes just one disruptive student to destroy the learning that is supposed to take place in the classroom. Although we must also help  problem children, who are purposefully  disruptive,  we must realize that the resources of the classroom teacher to deal with purposeful disruptions in the class are limited. Teachers must concentrate on the decent students that do not routinely disrupt the classrooms. And finally, the administration must provide good support to teachers in the area of student disipline especially when the disruptions are intentional in nature.

About the author
Stewart E Brekke is a retired physics, chemistry and math teacher from the Chicago Public Schools. He has taught 26 years. Stewart has a PhD from the International University for Graduate Studies, and an Ms in Ed from Purdue University-Calumet. He spends his retired years presenting scientific physics and math papers at professional meetings and writes about educational subjects.

 

 

Pages: 1 2



Comment on this article...

Next Article...
 
This entry was posted on Saturday, March 1st, 2014 and is filed under *ISSUES, Mar 2014, Stewart Brekke. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Teachers.Net Gazette Vol.11 No.3 March 2014

Harry & Rosemary Wong: Effective Teaching
Teaching New Teachers How to Succeed
Cover Story by Sarah Powley
Danger Zone! Teachers Face Threats of Broken Bones, Orwell and Autonomy
More Teacher Articles...
»Give It Away, Give It Away, Give It Away NowSharon Thomas
»Teaching in Finland: Special Classes that are Not "Specials"Tim Walker
»Word Up!Todd R. Nelson
»Simplicity is the Ultimate Sophistication (Or So Says Leonardo da Vinci)Colin Hussey
»Guidelines for Responsible Internet Use in the ClassroomGeorge Brown
»Dealing with Learned HelplessnessBarbara Blackburn and Dr. Bradley Witzel
»9 Strategies to Use Current Events in the ClassroomJennifer Davis Bowman Ed.D.
»Writing Prompts for MarchJames Wayne
»Featured Lesson: Multiplying One-Digit NumbersTeachers.Net Lesson Bank
»What's Going on in Your State?Teachers.Net Resources
»Understanding AutismLeah Davies, M.Ed.
»Top Tweets for TeachersNews Desk
»Purposefully Disruptive Students in the ClassroomStewart Brekke
»Living Green: A Turtle's Quest for a Cleaner Planet Published in JabberblabberNews Desk
»Apple Seeds of WisdomBarb Stutesman
»March Is... Full of Special DaysRon Victoria

By State
AL   AK   AZ   AR   CA   CO   CT   DE   DC   FL   GA   HI   ID   IL   IN   IA   KS   KY   LA    ME   MD   MA   MI   MN   MS   MO   MT   NE   NV   NH   NJ   NM   NY   NC   ND   OH   OK   OR   PA   RI   SC   SD   TN   TX   UT   VT     VA   WA   WV   WI   WY