Chatboards
Mailrings
Classifieds
Lessons
Jobs
Harry Wong
Projects
Live!
Gazette
Advertise
SUBSCRIBE | SUBMIT
Oct 2017
Vol 14 No 3
BACK ISSUES


Writing Like a Scientist – A Model Project of Disciplinary Literacy

By Sarah Powley, Education Coach
 


Follow Sarah Powley on Twitter @AmericanClassrm

The first year, we just put a toe in the water: We addressed the use of the passive voice.

The next year, we took on pronouns.

This year, my colleague and I dove in head first: We tackled passive voice, pronoun usage, scientific description, conciseness, the particular vocabulary of science, and (of course) citations and internal documentation. The goal: improved Science Fair projects–and ones that read like science writing.

An instructional coach for secondary teachers, I was thrilled three years ago when Mrs. Amanda Cox approached me about her goal for the year: incorporating the Indiana Academic Standards for Literacy into her Honors biology classes. Mrs. Cox took the standards  to heart.  “I want my students to write like scientists,” she told me, “but they don’t know how–and I’m not sure I know how to teach them. I’m not an English teacher.”

She’s not alone. The literacy standards–which apply across the curriculum–challenge many content area teachers.  Writing instruction begins in grade school, but the skills that are emphasized are the ones in the English teacher’s toolbox: introductions that capture the reader’s attention, strong action verbs, colorful vocabulary choices, rhetorical questions, apt quotations.

English teachers don’t focus on the language of science. We want variety in sentence length and structure to sustain interest in the content, and we aim for metaphor, simile, and other figures of speech for the same reason. The passive voice gives us the heebie-jeebies.

If you’re a content area teacher, it is easy enough to require writing, but requiring something means teaching it–or knowing for sure that it has been taught–and then grading it. Where is the professional development in reading and writing for content area teachers?  It came, delightfully and productively for my colleague and me, in the form of co-teaching.

We began with the passive voice, one of the most distinctive features of science writing–and a requirement for the Science Fair project.  In science, it’s the discovery that is important; the role of the specific scientist is downplayed. So, in a  traditional write-up of a scientific investigation, the scientist is missing from his or her report. Instead of saying “I discovered X,” a researcher would write, “X was discovered.” Mrs. Cox’s 9th grade students had never even heard of passive voice.

A grammar lesson was necessary, and I was happy to prepare and deliver it. An English teacher by training, I was in my element. Even more fun, I was in front of students again. I had a chance to refresh my classroom skills.

With practice, Mrs. Cox’s students learned to write sentences in the passive voice. Their lab reports began to sound a little more scientific. But a quantitative payoff wasn’t there. The average grade on the Science Fair projects that year was the same as the year before: 76%.

So the next year we tackled pronoun usage. Again, in science writing, pronouns are scarce. When one is used, its antecedent is unmistakable.  So another grammar lesson was in order: What’s a pronoun? What’s an antecedent? Why do they have to agree? And what’s agreement anyway?

Every English teacher in the country knows how pesky pronouns can be and how tough it is for kids to master them. Drill and kill doesn’t much work as a strategy for learning. A teacher can spray red ink on a paper like Round-up on weeds and still the pronoun errors sprout again in the next paper.

Mrs. Cox and I decided on an old-fashioned revision method: We projected sentences onto the whiteboard that we had drawn from the students’ own lab reports and, working together as a class, corrected them. That process worked well.  In correcting the pronoun errors, of course, we uncovered other problems and eliminated those, too: problems of conciseness and specificity, problems of vocabulary and redundancy.

For example:

.
New information is important because it can change the way you view other information.

became

New information changes the way other information is viewed.

.

We couldn’t figure it out but as we received new information and hints, we got closer and eventually we got it.

became

Understanding developed gradually.

.

New information and scientific processes are important because they help further our understanding and develop our research.

became

Scientific inquiry yields new understandings that, in turn, inform further research.

.

By the end of that second year, students were more sensitive to language and could quickly [go to pg 2]

 

 

Pages: 1 2



Comment on this article...

Next Article...
 
This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 12th, 2017 and is filed under *ISSUES, October 2017, Sarah Powley. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Teachers.Net Gazette Vol.14 No.3 Oct 2017
Cover Story by Sarah Powley
Writing Like a Scientist – A Model Project of Disciplinary Literacy
More Teacher Articles...
»Classroom Management Articles by Harry and Rosemary WongHarry K. & Rosemary Wong
»Increasing Student Ownership of LearningBarbara Blackburn
»Classroom Management Articles by Harry K. Wong and Rosemary Wong – All FREE here!Harry K. & Rosemary Wong
»Poetry Ruined My LifeTodd R. Nelson
»When Yoda Taught Pre-KAbigail Flesch Connors
»The Learning Curve, and Other Books by Todd NelsonTeachers.Net News Desk
»Tips for Success When Working with ParaprofessionalsTeachers.Net News Desk
»Exploring the Science of Sounds: 100 Musical Activities for Young ChildrenAbigail Flesch Connors
»Periodic Table of TechTeachers.Net News Desk
»Teaching Nature of Science (NOS) to Elementary StudentsRanu Roy
»Code 7: Cracking the Code for an Epic LifeTeachers.Net News Desk
»Crowd & The Cloud – Citizen Science ProjectsInternet Scout Report
»Use TreeSnap App to Assist In Forest StudyInternet Scout Report
»Think Like a Scientist – ResourceInternet Scout Report
»Writing Like a Scientist – A Model Project of Disciplinary LiteracySarah Powley, Education Coach
»Apple Seeds – Quotes for EducatorsBarb Stutesman
»How to Avoid Flaws in Teacher FeedbackJeny Rapheal

By State
AL   AK   AZ   AR   CA   CO   CT   DE   DC   FL   GA   HI   ID   IL   IN   IA   KS   KY   LA    ME   MD   MA   MI   MN   MS   MO   MT   NE   NV   NH   NJ   NM   NY   NC   ND   OH   OK   OR   PA   RI   SC   SD   TN   TX   UT   VT     VA   WA   WV   WI   WY